Great company, great culture. - Anonymous employee Health Catalyst Employee Review

4.0
12 Aug 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mission-driven, company values, care about employees

Cons

leadership development opportunities; remote employee experience,

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
6y
Thank you for your review and feedback. And thank you for your contributions, made over a long period of time, from our fantastic Minneapolis office. Your work is so meaningful and it matters. We certainly do care about each of our team members, including you. As I mentioned in my most recent visit to your office, the work that you each accomplish on behalf of one of our largest clients, is directly tied to our company's mission, and is incredibly meaningful. I also appreciate your feedback regarding the remote team member experience and your desire to see more leadership development opportunities. These are areas of consistent focus for us, and we're working to be systemically good in both these areas, but there's always room for improvement. If you'd be open to sharing with me your ideas of how we can be better, I'd be happy to visit 1:1 with you -- Jenn Howard can help set that up. Thanks again for your years of contribution and support of the mission. Best, Dan

Explore other reviews about Health Catalyst

5.0
30 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote work, good pay, wonderful people

Cons

The company grew too big too fast and has been trying to downsize erratically

3.0
5 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great Talent & Culture: The people here are highly capable, collaborative, and committed to helping each other succeed. The partnership between onshore and offshore teams works well and is a real strength. There’s a culture of grit and stability that has helped the company navigate multiple major transitions over the years. Mission-Critical Engineering: The work involves complex data infrastructure that requires deep technical expertise. It can be demanding, but seeing these systems run successfully and support real-world operations is consistently rewarding.

Cons

Wage Compression and Retention Risk: Compensation for tenured and high-performing staff has not kept pace with the market for specialized data engineering and support leadership. In practice, tenure can feel undervalued or even penalized. This creates risk around losing institutional knowledge and operational continuity. Stagnant Career Progression: Contrary to stated expectations, strong performance ratings do not consistently translate into meaningful, market-aligned compensation growth. The process of how compensation is benchmarked lacks clarity in practice, obscuring how compensation decisions are made and what is required to advance.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All