A disappointment - Anonymous employee Gusto Employee Review

2.0
23 Mar 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Really smart people work here, some of the best I've worked with. Everyone genuinely cares about their job and about the success of the company. The product is top notch and solving a real need. Free food/some great perks.

Cons

I was really excited about the mission and culture that everyone talked to me about during my extensive interview process. It seemed like somewhere that was thoughtful and really cared about its employees and customers. Once I started, I realized that what they cared about was how much work they could get out of each employee. The leadership team talks about the values so much that you can recite them in your sleep. While they all seem great in theory, it becomes clear after awhile that they are almost all focused around making this job your life. Managers would often say "it's a marathon not a sprint" and talks all the time about taking breaks, but still expect each employee to 60-70 hours every week and keep up with emails after hours and on weekends with no break at all. The thirst that recruiters and hiring managers have for getting Ivy-League talent is unreal. I was in multiple conversations with hiring managers who would reject a candidate because they didn't have the "background they were looking for" or they weren't a "culture fit" which almost always meant that they didn't go to an impressive enough school or have amazing companies on their resume prior to interviewing at Gusto. I'm all for keeping the bar high, but that kind of elitism is really disconcerting especially for a company who's mission is "putting people first". I think the biggest disappointment came from seeing just how obsessed Gusto is with being seen as "the best place to work" but how little they actually care about making sure employees are happy. They treat it as an honor to even be able to be part of the team and I saw them let a startling amount of employees go in the year that I was there. The leadership's rhetoric around this was that "people should be at a company that is the best fit for them. We really appreciate all they've done for Gusto, but ultimately felt that they would be better suited somewhere else." Behind the scenes, these employees were working insane hours, had very little to no direction from their managers, and were killing themselves to try to keep their jobs. I knew team members that were miserable in their jobs but were terrified to tell their managers that they were unhappy or feeling overwhelmed because they didn't want to be let go.

avatar
Gusto Response
10y
I’m sorry to hear that your experience at Gusto was disappointing. We do hope employees are engaged in what they are doing and excited to do their jobs and look for that alignment. Employee engagement is something we do track holistically, and while this metric has historically been high (90+%), we recognize that there’s still 10% who may not be as engaged. We encourage those who are feeling like they cannot talk to their PEs to talk to the People team. Ownership mentality is not only applicable to how one approaches a task or project, but also how Gusties think about their hours. Company-wide communications and dialogues have been aimed at making sure those who are working long hours know it’s okay to have a dialogue about that with your team and/or the People team. In our hiring, while there are Ivy League grads who work at Gusto, we also have hired many who aren’t. We believe that education is only one indicator of many. Ultimately, the hiring process is about finding candidates with shared values, aligned motivations, and relevant skills. The recently launched Interview (Watermelon) Team specifically looks for shared values.

Explore other reviews about Gusto

5.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Smart and friendly coworkers. Excellent team culture

Cons

Tunnel visions on AI a bit too much

2.0
20 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The product is genuinely good, too bad the same can’t be said for how they treat the people who sell it.

Cons

Leadership talks a big game about people-first culture but the reality doesn’t match. The Chicago office expansion felt like a poorly thought-out experiment, new hires were brought on without a clear long-term commitment, and layoffs came without warning, leaving people blindsided. Crossing a billion dollars in revenue and still cutting employees sends a clear message about where workers rank on the priority list. Remote work flexibility is also a glaring weakness. For a company selling HR software to modern businesses, their internal stance on where employees can work is surprisingly rigid and hypocritical. The “flexibility” messaging is mostly optics. The broader concern is the AI roadmap. The automation push feels less like an innovation strategy and more like a slow wind-down of the workforce. Employees aren’t blind to it, it creates anxiety and erodes trust. The culture of transparency they promote externally is largely a facade internally.

9
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All