employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Dynamics Mission Systems

Engaged employer

Poor and Inefficient upper management has been the inherent culture - Anonymous employee General Dynamics Mission Systems Employee Review

1.0
2 Sept 2011
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good name on a resume

Cons

No care for personal and family sacrifice to go beyond the job requirements to complete a project or bring in a sale. Usually a verbal "thank you" is considered sufficient without any mention in your record or yearly review. Instead, management looks for the negative aspects to support their meager sub 2% annual raise which is always below national inflation rate! Satcom has depended on Govt business in the past years as their main income and with the declining Govt business, there is no new hires for those good and wise employees who move on to greener pastures. Hence those left behind have to take up the slack and do more. Most empoyees would not have a problem doing this but with no acknowlegement or reward from management or managers who don't support and back up their employees, this only leads to bitterment and disgruntal. Unfortunately, the management don't get it or don't care. This has been the culture for decades. With the current unemployment rate and the poor economic situation, jobs are not plentiful out there. So a job with bad management is better than none at all. This is the only thing that Satcom has on their side that is preventing mass attrition.

Explore other reviews about General Dynamics Mission Systems

5.0
13 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good team and interesting product,

Cons

Ai adoption is somewhat forced

1
4.0
26 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good work life balance Projects matter for our war fighters Most co-workers are competent and dedicated More work than people, and moving to other engineering jobs is possible

Cons

Some numbskulls seem to get into senior positions. A "Consolidation" of buildings is underfunded, poorly planned, and drives chaos. The push to squeeze every nickel of efficiency means that there isn't always money for equipment or team building events (below the VP level).

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All