My worst professional experience to date - Manager Expedia Group Employee Review

2.0
6 Feb 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Good office space - Good health care

Cons

- They pride themselves on undercutting people on salary. They play the "you'll be working with the brightest people in Seattle" card and it is untrue. Not worth taking the pay cut. - 50 to 60-hour weeks are the norm, with little recognition of hard work. Your work laptop will always be on no matter where you are. - Employee support and information for new hires (actually all employees) is abysmal - Monstrous bureaucracy leaves everyone in constant state of confusion and frustration - Upper management with no leadership or interpersonal skills - If you ever wanted to see an organization with middle and upper management throwing their individual contributors under the bus, this is your case study - Listening to company-wide executive reports and off-site presentations is like being at a frat party. Executive management is mostly white male and they do not understand or support their diverse employee base of genders and ethnicities.

Explore other reviews about Expedia Group

5.0
19 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great industry to explore, impressive campus, nice people.

Cons

Old tech stack that requires significant changes

avatar
Expedia Group Response
3w
Thank you for your 5-star review! We're glad that we've made a positive impact on you. We hear you on your feedback about our tech stack and are constantly improving in our offerings. All the best!
2.0
29 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Constant state of transformation is ripe environment for new hires and functional experts from big name tech companies

Cons

Pre-covid the culture was really special. Collaborative, engaging, people-centric, with a unifying mission to enable travel for the world. Since covid there has been a revolving door of executive leadership, and with each round, they throw out the current strategy to try something "new" without building from the current or past successes. Constant change, but no clear vision or strategy of what they are trying to change to. Lack of strategy and low risk tolerance leads to too many priorities with not enough investment to move the needle in anything. Quarterly layoffs, but executed quietly team by team so as not to make news. No psychological safety. Talent strategy since covid is to hire externally over internal promotions to gain "functional expertise" therefore difficult to grow your career. Siloed divisions not working towards common goal. Lacks operating model maturity needed for a company of this size likely do to revolving door of execs and priorities. A cash cow company with an identity crisis trying to be an AI innovator. Build vs buy mentality slows them down. Too many exec pet projects that aren't vetted with proper business cases.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All