A place to make a difference - Anonymous employee Elanco Employee Review

5.0
9 Oct 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people live the values. The purpose is deeply embedded in the culture (Food and Companionship enriching life). Exciting to be part of an entrepreneurial, fast paced organization that has high aspirations for becoming a lead animal health org. Face pace means opportunities to do more, earlier in your career than at other more established orgs.

Cons

Not a place for someone who needs high stability and high order. Still a lot of work going on to get systems and processes stood up post Bayer Animal Health Acquisition.

avatar
Elanco Response
3y
Thank your or this thoughtful review. Your title says so much about our company and Elanco’s culture – truly agree, Elanco is a place to make a difference.

Explore other reviews about Elanco

5.0
14 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Management listens to their emoloyees. Great benefits.

Cons

Old equipment. Lots of forced ot for hourly employees

avatar
Elanco Response
1w
We appreciate your positive feedback regarding management and benefits. At Elanco, we are dedicated to the wellbeing of our employees and are always looking for opportunities for improvement - we thank you for your feedback!
2.0
20 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.

Cons

Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue. Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees. Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All