Very siloed, ever changing direction, clueless leaders, empty visions and promises. And layoff after layoff cycle that does not seem to have end in sight.
Elanco Response
4y
Thank you for appreciating our future of work model, which gives the flexibility of working at home. Elanco is on the journey to build a global, independent animal health leader with the vision “Food and Companionship Enriching Life.” To be well-positioned for the next era of growth, it requires commitment and change. We value our people - thank you for sharing your thoughts. We take your feedback seriously.
Management listens to their emoloyees. Great benefits.
Cons
Old equipment. Lots of forced ot for hourly employees
Elanco Response
1w
We appreciate your positive feedback regarding management and benefits. At Elanco, we are dedicated to the wellbeing of our employees and are always looking for opportunities for improvement - we thank you for your feedback!
Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.
Cons
Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue.
Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees.
Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.