Pros
Working remote is the only pro
Cons
The company has shown a prolonged inability to define or commit to a clear strategic direction. Over the past five years, leadership has failed to make the US office profitable, despite repeated promises, shifting priorities, and multiple attempts at reorganization. These frequent restructures, often accompanied by leadership turnover, have created confusion, instability, and a lack of accountability, with no meaningful improvement to show for it. Rather than addressing underlying structural or strategic problems, the company has relied on surface level changes. Teams have been reorganized multiple times under different leaders, each bringing new initiatives that are quickly abandoned. This constant reset has wasted time, eroded institutional knowledge, and left employees unclear about goals, ownership, or long term expectations. Financial and talent management decisions further reflect poor judgment. While the company is currently enforcing a hiring freeze, it has laid off lower and mid level employees, often those doing the day to day work, while continuing to hire or retain senior leaders who add little measurable value. This imbalance has increased workloads on remaining staff, reduced execution capacity, and reinforced the perception that leadership is disconnected from operational reality. Senior leadership lacks credibility and trust across the organization. Decision making is slow, inconsistent, and often reversed, contributing to widespread frustration. Morale is low, and the culture has become increasingly toxic. Micromanagement is now pervasive, replacing trust and autonomy with excessive oversight, which has further damaged engagement, creativity, and productivity. There is no clear, concrete vision for growth. Strategic goals are vague, frequently changing, or communicated inconsistently. Employees are often given unrealistic or misleading impressions about future opportunities, career growth, and the company’s stability, only to see those assurances quietly walked back later. With the US office widely expected to close in 2026, many employees feel they are simply waiting for an inevitable outcome rather than working toward a shared future. Overall, the company reflects sustained mismanagement of both people and resources, and it stands out as the most poorly run and least fulfilling organization I have worked for.