Not worth the BS - Server Cosm Employee Review

2.0
14 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Certain servers can make a lot of money on certain events but it’s extremely inconsistent on both a day to day scale and over the course of the year. Food is okay but employees are limited in what they’re allowed to eat. There’s a lot going on if you like sports and it’s fast paced, but usually disorganized.

Cons

Schedules have never been out more than a few days in advance and hours are constantly changing up until the night before or day of. No one ever knows what’s going on in the building because management doesn’t communicate at all and HR is unresponsive to most issues that happen on the floor. New hires are promised full time but it never happens. Many part time people end up working full time hours but the company refuses to grant benefits. Runners and bussers are not tipped. Fans are disrespectful and tip out is abysmal. No opening or closing sheets, no SOP or procedures. They’ll boast about how advanced their tech is but the POS is horrible. Talk a lot of talk about company culture but I rarely see it in practice. Don’t believe them when they tell you there’s room for career growth, the most you’ll see is busser to server or the like and they’ll make you wait months

Explore other reviews about Cosm

5.0
27 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fun place to work. Creative freedom.

Cons

Smaller / fragmented offices with minimal communication.

3.0
23 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A tolerable and orderly environment for junior engineers to acquire their first real professional habits Work is clearly delineated and unlikely to overwhelm those early in their careers Provides a serviceable apprenticeship in contemporary software practices

Cons

Engineering work, once mastered, settles into predictable repetition Product efforts favor regular displays of activity over substantive technical advancement Releases occur with limited forethought, transferring avoidable burden onto engineering The absence of a dependable release pipeline results in unnecessary complexity and recurring friction Platform capabilities remain underdeveloped for an organization of this ambition Senior engineers are often occupied with mitigating preventable inefficiencies rather than advancing the system Decisions are frequently shaped by long-standing personal affiliations, rather than open technical evaluation Appearances are carefully maintained, while genuine engineering momentum lags For senior and lead engineers, opportunities for influence conclude sooner than expected

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All