employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Center for European Policy Analysis

Is this your company?

Worst Job I've Ever Had - Anonymous employee Center for European Policy Analysis Employee Review

1.0
30 Sept 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I made great connections with fellow employees all of whom have since left.

Cons

Salaries for non-directors are low compared to other think tanks in the area. There was no work-life balance and employees often had to work until 9 or 10 pm, on the weekends, and when they were supposed to be on vacation. Leadership did not take any criticism or accountability for mistakes and could take weeks to respond to emails. Small mistakes were blown out of proportion, leadership had no respect for employees' time, they used any information you gave them about your personal life against you, and leadership talked about employees behind their back. Expectations and procedures were constantly changed with no notice and were often not advertised to the whole organization until someone used an outdated file and got yelled at. Multiple complaints were made to HR which resulted in the first HR consultant being let go and when replacements were brought in and another HR complaint was made the 2 HR consultants both left the company. The board either doesn't know or doesn't care. They currently have no head of finance, no Russia program, and no development team.

Explore other reviews about Center for European Policy Analysis

5.0
14 Aug 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Great access to senior fellows - incredibly well connected staff

Cons

- unpaid, but still a wonderful opportunity for students while in school

1.0
7 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

CEPA is affiliated with a number of highly knowledgeable experts and fellows who produce substantive, policy-relevant work. There are opportunities to engage with interesting topics and external stakeholders, and junior staff can gain exposure to high-level discussions and events. Colleagues at the staff level are generally capable and committed, often going above and beyond to deliver despite internal challenges. While there are talented experts and fellows affiliated with CEPA who produce substantive work, those outcomes tend to occur despite the organization’s internal dynamics, not because of them. The internal environment makes it difficult to translate expertise into consistent, high-quality output.

Cons

CEPA suffers from deep, glaring structural and leadership issues that significantly undermine its credibility and effectiveness. Within Washington policy circles, CEPA is not regarded as a serious or influential institution, and its reputation reflects that reality. At the leadership level, there is a consistent lack of strategic direction, accountability, and professional management. Priorities shift frequently and without clear rationale, creating an environment where staff are unable to execute effectively or sustain meaningful progress. Senior leadership behavior is embarrassing. Always counterproductive marked by poor communication, reactive decision-making, and very public criticism of staff without any constructive guidance. Day-to-day operations are characterized by instability and low morale. Staff are frequently subjected to shifting expectations, last-minute changes, and a lack of clear feedback. Meetings are often disorganized or disrupted, and leadership engagement is inconsistent, when they choose to show up. The workplace culture falls short of any basic professional standards, which further detracts from productivity and organizational cohesion. One leader at the organization brought her chihuahua to the office and it would often jump on tables during meetings. In short, the combination of weak, feckless leadership, unclear priorities, and an inconsistent professional environment makes CEPA a challenging and, in many cases, counterproductive organization to work with or rely on.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All