Cult company with horrible upper management - Anonymous employee CAMILLA Employee Review

1.0
12 Jul 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I am struggling to even come up with one.

Cons

Cult like company with awful upper management. It is just a popularity contest for who is actually recognised and financially rewarded, HR is there to protect the company not help employees, terrible pay. Have witnessed upper management under the influence of alcohol and drugs while working. “Coke” is a regular substance used in the office. HR was notified and they just ignored it. The company has a wfh policy for head office staff- however upper management chooses their “favourites” who are actually allowed to wfh and makes others come in 5 days a week. They falsely advertise their jobs, push so much extra work on you that is not covered in your contract and expect you to work over time even though they hide behind a “healthy work life balance.” This company will emotionally destroy you.

Explore other reviews about CAMILLA

5.0
10 Feb 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great staff. Very supportive management.

Cons

None. This is a fantastic city.

1.0
18 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Beautiful product and strong brand aesthetic. * Loyal client base that genuinely loves the brand. * Opportunity to gain experience in luxury retail, clienteling, and styling. * Some talented and hardworking people at the store level.

Cons

* Significant disconnect between corporate expectations and the realities of store operations. * Aggressive sales, clienteling, and performance expectations without consistent support, staffing, or resources. * Frequent changes in priorities and direction made it difficult to execute effectively. * Communication often felt reactive rather than proactive. * Store leaders were held highly accountable for results but did not always have the tools or support needed to achieve them. * High-pressure environment that could contribute to burnout. * Unrealistic conversion and performance expectations relative to traffic and market conditions. * Heavy emphasis on metrics without always addressing the root causes impacting performance. * Frequent turnover and staffing challenges. * Limited partnership between field leadership and store teams. * Store managers expected to wear multiple hats simultaneously (sales leader, recruiter, trainer, operations manager, clienteling lead, visual merchandiser, etc.) with limited support from regional or HQ. Initiative and problem-solving were frequently required to keep the business running, yet solutions implemented out of necessity were often met with criticism or requests for revision rather than recognition and support. * Reactive rather than strategic decision-making. * Lack of consistency in accountability across teams and locations. * Difficulty maintaining work-life balance due to the demands of the role. * Feedback from store-level leaders did not always feel heard or acted upon. Overall, store leaders were expected to deliver results comparable to much larger organizations while operating with significantly fewer resources and support.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All