PSA - Writer Beebom Employee Review

1.0
30 Mar 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Decent team. Good pay. Not much else.

Cons

Bosses micromanage everything even though they have little to no knowledge of any of the company's verticals. Barely any scope for personal growth. The management is heavily biased towards a couple of people in the team, the rest are replaceable. The entire workflow is governed by the whims and fancies of the bosses, but the employees are always at fault if the company suffers because of their mistake. No job security. Attrition rate is high. The bosses can stoop as low as removing your byline from the articles you wrote to add their own name instead. Even if it's clear as day that they barely know any English, let alone enough to write a half decent article. You're required to bring your own system to work, but the company won't reimburse you if something happens to your system at work. They make it quite clear that it's your problem, not theirs. Join only if you know how to deal with people who have a clear case of superiority complex. Also, do not trust the HR. She's not an actually an HR, just a puppet who's responsibilities include hiring/firing and tattling on employees, who share their grievances, for brownie points.

Explore other reviews about Beebom

3.0
4 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Worked with highly knowledgeable professionals. Very cool work culture. However, it the work is very monotonous that can cause burnout.

Cons

Very poor management by the HR. At the time of exit, I was denied the payment of my reimbursement after they received the parcel. They told me it was cancelled out because of my paid leave quota usage for the year, even though I was never informed anything about it. This is very unprofessional as none of it was mentioned or addressed beforehand.

2.0
23 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good pay. That's really the only positive aspect I can highlight.

Cons

Where do I start? 1. The editing process lacks constructive feedback. Work is heavily micromanaged, and the environment feels unappreciative. Mistakes are quickly pointed out, but good work is rarely acknowledged or validated. 2. There is a significant amount of micromanagement from the founders and co-founders. They heavily step in to regulate the published content, which creates the impression that they do not trust the editorial team's leadership. It is not a great outlook. 3. The HR department does not feel like a safe advocate for employees. Providing anonymous feedback is difficult, and there is a pervasive fear that bringing up issues will be used against you, contributing to a highly difficult work culture. 4. Employee well-being does not seem to be a priority. The expectations are incredibly rigid, and there are far too many unreasonable restrictions on how and when you can use your leaves. 5. Writers lack visibility into how their work performs. Performance metrics and numbers are not shared proactively unless you specifically request them. 6. The organization is extremely focused on capital. From my perspective, the editorial and video direction heavily favors sponsored content, which often requires focusing strictly on positive coverage. This compromises the authenticity of the reviews being pushed out to millions of followers who take them seriously. 7. Favoritism is highly prominent. Career progression and promotions seem heavily dependent on the appeasement of senior staff rather than merit. I've seen people rise in the ranks way too quickly simply by playing office politics. If you offer critical feedback or speak ill of anyone, you are largely ignored and sidelined like a ghostwriter.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All