Pros
- Above market compensation and highly lucrative severance packages at the cost of instability (both personal and professional).
- If you are looking to cash a high paycheck and don't mind an environment defined by consultant theater, the short-term financial rewards are there.
Cons
- The company lacks moral and technical clarity. The product is marketed as powered by cutting-edge AI, but under the hood, it relies on basic, legacy algorithms. The vast majority of data science parsing is outsourced to teams in India, and employees are strictly coerced into maintaining the façade of an in-house tech powerhouse.
- Fundamental, core flaws in the product are never actually fixed. Instead, leadership throws expensive consultants and junior ex-consultants without families or dependents at the problem, exploiting their willingness to work late hours to "consult away" systemic architectural failures.
- The numbers speak for themselves. With over 60+ departures in the US alone in just a few short years (excluding unknown but likely high attrition in London and India), this is not a sustainable company.
- Leadership completely mismanages performance across the board. When strategic hiring blunders and over-hiring inevitably catch up to them, they refuse to take accountability. Instead, they gaslight and scapegoat individual employees making up performance accusations to justify people leaving or terminations rather than admitting to organizational shortsightedness.
- While the severance pay is generous, it functions purely as hush money they try to use to sweeten themselves for those leaving. Terminated employees are bound by strict non-disparagement agreements to prevent the public from learning about the toxic internal reality.