Neurones are not welcome! It’s all about processes, punctuation and ASEM colours. - Anonymous employee ASEF Employee Review

1.0
14 Mar 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice building. If you are in a programme department, you meet various stakeholders from many different countries. Projects and partners may save you from insanity inflicted by internal psychosis.

Cons

Mostly incompetent people in key positions especially in (top) management and HR. The (top) management being seconded by the governments of member countries makes it a joke especially when these people are diplomats. They seem to have been dropped at ASEF either because they are reaching retirement age or their governments discard them for a while for various reasons. The only thing they are good at is bureaucracy thus paralysing the organisation. No vision, crap leadership if any, no respect, no recognition (unless you forget about your neurones and simply become a brown noser or cheerleader such as the chief of staff for instance), badly compensated, no training and NO TRUST. As it is, it’s no place for experienced people. For less experienced, don’t stay more than 2-3 years because you’ll lose touch with the world out there.

Explore other reviews about ASEF

1.0
16 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Exposure different culture and projects, stakeholders and partners

Cons

If you value meritocracy, transparency, and basic professionalism, think carefully before joining the Executive Office. In my experience, decision-making was driven by personal loyalty and sycophancy rather than measurable performance and track-record, and formal guidelines on promotion were treated as optional when they became inconvenient. Promotions and recognition often appeared disconnected from documented outcomes. Processes that should have required objective criteria, consistent scoring, and HR-aligned checks were handled informally, with shifting rationales and post-hoc explanations. The result was a workplace where talented people spent more time managing politics than delivering results, and where doing excellent work did not at all translate into fair opportunities. The culture strongly rewards flattery. The fastest way to “shine” is not to exceed targets or demonstrate leadership, it’s to stay agreeable and servile, offer constant praise upward, and avoid raising legitimate concerns. People who ask for clarity, evidence, or adherence to policy may find themselves quietly isolated, mischaracterised, or blamed for issues they didn’t create. A final caution: be careful around senior “gatekeeper” who controls executive office access, messaging, and narratives around leadership. In my experience, they are highly skilled at reframing events, triangulating colleagues, and shaping perceptions while maintaining plausible deniability. Treat conversations as transactional, keep everything in writing, and document decisions meticulously for your own good, never trust the gatekeeper. Overall, I would not recommend working in this office unless you are comfortable operating in an environment where optics outrank substance and where policy compliance depends on who benefits.

1
4.0
2 Feb 2026
Anonymous contractor
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Colleagues were generally alright overall.

Cons

Need to travel a little bit for meals.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All