I applied through a recruiter. The process took 3 days. I interviewed at Warner Bros. Discovery (Bengaluru) in Mar 2025
Interview
1. Inefficient Process: After clearing the coding round, I was scheduled for three additional rounds. Instead of conducting them based on performance progression, all were scheduled upfront, consuming a significant amount of time.
2. Lack of Transparency: After completing all rounds, there was complete silence from the company. I had to follow up to get a response, only to be informed that I wasn’t selected.
3. Wasted Time for Both Sides: The company could have conducted interviews in a phased manner, providing timely feedback rather than making candidates go through all rounds only to reject them later.
I applied online. I interviewed at Warner Bros. Discovery (Hyderābād) in Feb 2026
Interview
1st round- coding (onsite)
2nd round- system design of rate limiter, need to design classes , their interaction and assumption, focus on interaction and end-to-end flow.
3rd round- project detailed architecture discussion, lot of cross questions on design decision and trade offs
I applied online. I interviewed at Warner Bros. Discovery (Toronto, ON) in Feb 2026
Interview
I do not question the interview; it is their way of doing things, but the feedback was neither constructive nor open. The Talent Acquisitions team got back to me and reached out to TA to give more details. The hiring team is not organized because they could not set a time for weeks, even though I provided several options. They do not have modern tools to help schedule interviews.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
General introduction of your profile and Langton's Ant LeetCode problem.
I interviewed at Warner Bros. Discovery (Bengaluru)
Interview
The interview process felt disorganized, with rounds happening in an unusual order — it started with an initial discussion with a senior manager, followed by an operational excellence round, then system design, and finally the coding round.
