I applied online. I interviewed at U.S. News & World Report (Washington, DC)
Interview
it was formal process. First telephone screening, then with the hiring manager which was more technical and scenario based. final interview was with the panel. they had the standard rubric which was more behaviural. The panelists were very friendly.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
If you find some error in your collected data how do you validate them
I applied online. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at U.S. News & World Report in May 2025
Interview
Phone screen and then meeting with C-suite legal dep't. Questions were relevant enough to the position and executive was engaging.
HOWEVER, interview can be filed under "Sham" -- no feedback/update provided by screener when requested to do so over a week after the interview, and job listing was re-posted around that time on job board(s) despite having a stated timeline of starting a candidate that next month.
Fast forward four (4) months, job is now re-listed on job board(s). Again. What is going on, other than wasting candidates' time ??
The interview process was fairly standard, starting with an introductory conversation with the hiring manager, followed by meetings with team members; also includes a detailed case study in between that takes 2-4 hours.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Tell me about a time you used data to influence a product decision.