Tines interview questions

First call with HR was positive, I received test assignment shortly after the call. The interview had 2 parts - one for product design and another one for coding. I got feedback next day stating skills I need to focus on.

I was recruited directly and fast-tracked through the process. Initial screening and interviews with the Senior Director of Legal went very well, and I was repeatedly told my background and answers were a strong fit. To “move quickly,” they combined multiple rounds, including a legal exercise I was asked to complete overnight. I turned it around in a few hours to meet their timeline. During the panel, I was stopped mid-presentation and told I had already shown enough, that my answers were “perfect,” and that I seemed “overqualified.” Nothing but positive signals. HR was so confident they even asked if I’d consider giving notice at my current job before receiving an offer (wild to even ask). I declined, but it showed how strongly they were signaling. The final step was positioned as a casual meet-and-greet with the COO (as was told to me in my previous interview). The conversation felt normal and professional. At the end, I asked how long he had been with the company as part of basic rapport-building, and he clarified he was a founder. Less than two hours later, I was told I was no longer being considered. The only explanation provided was that I “didn’t show enough knowledge about the company.” No specifics. No examples. This came after multiple earlier interviews where I had explicitly tied my answers to their values and business model and was told I was doing “perfect.” The process felt highly dependent on the personal impression of a single executive at the final stage, overriding weeks of consistent, positive feedback from the legal team, and significant effort/schedule-shuffling on my end. HR’s follow-up was vague, empty, and offered little concrete insight beyond generic talking points. After bending over backwards to meet their urgency and timelines, the outcome felt abrupt, inconsistent, and unprofessional. Takeaway: strong interactions with the legal team, but a hiring process that felt disorganized/immature, overly personality-driven at the top, and lacking professional closure. Candidates should be cautious about mixed signals, timeline pressure, and what this experience suggests about how the company functions internally.