I applied through an employee referral. I interviewed at Sutherland
Interview
The interview was good, but however they ghost us without giving any feedback even after asking them. The first round went well, 2nd round was coding, i didnt perform bad but not so good too
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Difference between supervised and unsupervised machine learning ?
I applied through other source. I interviewed at Sutherland
Interview
There was a technical test round at first. We were sent links and it included technical questions related to the field. The level was moderate. A person with adequate knowledge in the field will find it familiar to answer those questions.
I applied in-person. The process took 3 days. I interviewed at Sutherland (Bengaluru) in Oct 2021
Interview
It was two round technical interview , in the first round they went through basic conceptual questions and in the 2nd round it was tough as they dive deep into the depth and mathematics
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Sutherland (Hyderābād) in Aug 2021
Interview
1. HR has reached out on a job
2. Scheduled a call for 1 hour, ended the call with in 25 mins. The interviewer went worst. He did not even introduce himself, neither asked if I have any questions. He called himself to be a PM and has no clue on what methodologies are. When asked about methodologies he was mentioning ML Methods.
I lost respect for the organisation here. Did not even ask if I have any questions. I took the liberty to ask about his project and he failed to answer them.
2nd round -
2. It was a 1 hour interview. Panel joined 10 mins late and did not care about apologising nor introduced himself. I don't understand how can they be so odd.
The interviewer joined the call and sent me a link and asked me to implement linear regression on it over screen share with all the assumptions. I did but he looks quite less knowledgeable about it and he said the same thing as I said but with a different sentence formation and said what I mentioned was wrong, God knows what is wrong with him.
I used the 1 hour of time efficiently and gave him solutions. Out of the 3 I was able to answer 2 clearly and half not wisely. He was particular about that half and did not even look at the other 2. In this one hour the panel was on mute and did not even bother what was I doing or bothered to answer any.
Overall this is a bad experience. I do not want to interview with them again. Would have appreciate if the panel was a bit knowledgeable.