Sure! Here's the revised version of your comment in English, with an indirect reference to the individuals involved and a more polished, professional tone:
---
I recently went through a recruitment process that began on a positive note, marked by an initial conversation with HR that was both engaging and encouraging. Unfortunately, the following stages did not meet the same standard.
During the interview with members of the operational team, I noticed several inconsistencies. One participant appeared somewhat disengaged, frequently revisiting topics that had already been covered without offering new insights. Another focused heavily on a B2C use case that seemed only loosely related to the B2B context of the role, which made it difficult to convey the relevance of my experience—particularly in areas like B2B APIs.
After the interview, communication ceased entirely. Two weeks passed without any updates, prompting me to reach out to HR. The response was vague, simply stating that my application was “still under review.” A second follow-up a week later produced a similarly unclear answer, with no explanation for the extended delay or departure from typical recruitment timelines.
While I fully appreciate that hiring processes can differ and delays may occur, a more transparent and respectful communication approach would significantly improve the candidate experience.
