The process started normally — I applied through the careers page, shared additional details, and completed an assessment where I scored in the 95th percentile. Things became interesting in the L2 round. The discussion turned into a rapid-fire session of 50+ questions across multiple domains, including areas not even mentioned in the job description. I answered the majority of them correctly (~90%+), but it was hard to understand what exactly was being evaluated — depth, breadth, or just endurance.
Post-interview, the experience declined further. There was no proactive communication, and I had to follow up multiple times, only to eventually receive a generic automated rejection email — no feedback, no insights.
Overall, the process felt less like a structured evaluation and more like an attempt to make the interview appear “rigorous” by asking a high volume of scattered questions. Without clear expectations or meaningful feedback, it doesn’t seem like an effective way to identify the right candidates — just a time-consuming exercise for both sides.
