For the first first part of the interview, the interviewer asked me some general questions about myself and my thoughts about working in the IT industry. It went really well and I thought it was going in the right direction. After a 20 minute chat she told me that I will be interviewed by another member of staff. When another member of staff arrived she handed me a sheet of paper with a list of Maths questions and asked me to answer one of them. The question was: If Mary is 16 years old and her brother is 4 times younger than her, how old will Mary be if her brother was half her age. It took me a couple of minutes to answer and workout but eventually I answered accordingly. She then progressed to asked me a few more technical questions in which some I knew the answers to and a few I didn’t. One of the questions she asked me was what is objected oriented programming. I answered her question saying that it’s a programming software that lets you design the layout before you program, a WYSIWYG. She then went on to tell me that I was wrong and that WYSIWYG is the name of a software. I didn’t want to correct her since it was in the middle of an interview. Clearly she was incorrect. At the end of the interview she told me that I didn’t have enough technical knowledge and that I should consider doing a marketing job instead and left. I felt that this interview process was unfair and that I had been poorly misrepresented. I felt really disappointed when I left the building.

Applied and received an email asking to set up a phone interview. Was not called on time. Phone interviewer asked questions for maybe 10 minutes and talked about the company for 7 minutes.