I applied through a recruiter. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Deliveroo (Manchester City Centre, England) in Nov 2020
Interview
Recruiter + At Home Code Challenge + Video Call Tech + Behaviour.
The take-home tech challenge was a segment of code to parse CRON expressions.
Video call tech test was a GitHub project that was sent a couple of days earlier. Its aim is to write unit-tests and implement a feature in React.js.
I'm glad I took the time to explore it ahead and factor a process flow, I felt I was strong.
I took full advantage of the preparation.
The behaviour interview was welcoming, talking about how I manage time and projects, can I work remotely okay and with autonomy.
Overall it was a reasonable interview process.
2 coding tests (Online test and take home assignment)
3 round interviews (HR screen, Coding Review, System Design)
My last stage is the System Design interview
After the process, they sent me a review
I interviewed at Deliveroo (London, England) in Nov 2025
Interview
The process took so long, and I feel like I just lost my time.
I had to go through this process for a month, and by the end, I did not receive feedback.
1. Hr Call.
2. Take-home programming test
3.1 Take-home programming test followed by a pair programming test to review the code
3.2 System design. The recruiter told me it would be the same System design interview as always, but they asked me to design something different from what they had asked before.
3.3 Behaviour Interview.
I don't know what Deliveroo wants. All my interviews were positive, but the hiring committee decided not continue with the process. I didn't receive a feedback email saying what happened
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Same programming take-home test
The system design interview was different from what it used to be
Behavioural about leadership
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at Deliveroo in Oct 2025
Interview
Here's a professional expansion:
**Interview Process Experience:**
The process began with a recruiter screen where I engaged positively, acknowledging the recruiter's role in connecting candidates with opportunities. Shortly after, I received an online coding assessment—a standard but telling practice that increasingly signals companies offloading evaluation effort onto candidates' time without reciprocal investment.
**Reflection**: Online tests have become a filtering mechanism that extracts significant energy from job seekers while requiring minimal company resources. For someone with years of proven production experience, certifications, and a track record of delivering measurable impact, these generic assessments rarely capture actual capability or cultural fit. They often favor those who optimize for test-taking over those who excel at building real systems.
This approach suggests a transactional hiring philosophy rather than a genuine evaluation of senior engineering talent. Strong companies invest time upfront in meaningful technical conversations that assess judgment, architectural thinking, and collaboration—not algorithmic puzzle-solving under artificial constraints.
**Takeaway**: I'm seeking organizations that value demonstrated experience and engage candidates as professionals, not as interchangeable test-takers in a volume-driven pipeline.