The interview process involves a long test, initial technical round, and final round with MD. Discussions revolve around background, motivation, and lots of economics. I found the written test and initial interview stimulating.
However the entire interview process was done in bad faith. I was told at the end of my MD round that I would actually get an Economist role if at all and not Senior Economist due to lack of relevent experience. Why not mention it before? Then I got a rejection with no explanations whatsoever.
Seeing others comment the same thing, I think they may have some free time at hand and perhaps interview without intention at times. MD got confused with pareto and kaldor hicks efficiency.