Pros
Strong brand reputation in Indian fintech and a company many employees were once proud to be associated with. Previously had a trust-based, workflow-driven culture that focused on output rather than micromanagement. Good learning exposure in the early years, especially for people who stayed long-term and helped build systems from the ground up. Competitive compensation during growth phases, with performance-based raises that reflected contribution at the time. Smart colleagues and a generally high bar for work quality.
Cons
Significant shift away from the earlier flexible, trust-based culture to rigid working hours, with limited transition support for teams that previously functioned well under autonomy. Long-serving employees (6–7 years) who received raises in prior cycles are now being encouraged to opt for Voluntary Retirement Schemes, creating insecurity around long-term retention. Cost optimization appears to prioritize replacing experienced employees with lower-cost freshers, which can make years of dedication feel undervalued. Performance and quality checks have become unusually strict, with escalations issued for minor errors and limited tolerance during periods of frequent process, manager, and mentor changes. Adjustment time during organizational changes is minimal, while performance expectations remain high, increasing stress and fear of termination. The combined effect of rigid timings, aggressive quality enforcement, and VRS discussions creates an environment that feels more like managed attrition than voluntary exits. Declining sense of psychological safety for employees who once felt secure after years of consistent contribution.