How is management perceived at DroneShield?

There is honestly nothing positive to highlight about this company in terms of processes, management, or overall experience. The only redeeming aspect is that the staff are quite approachable and easy to talk to. Beyond that, there’s significant room for improvement across the board.

Timelines are consistently unrealistic, creating sustained pressure across teams. On a daily basis, team members express high levels of stress, yet there is little to no consideration or adjustment from leadership. There is a clear disconnect between expectations and practical delivery capacity. Leadership is a major concern. The current CTO demonstrates a lack of awareness across several critical areas and tends to rely heavily on micromanagement rather than strategic direction. Decision-making often follows a rigid “my way or the highway” approach, with little regard for input from managers or the realities faced by teams. There is also significant pressure passed down to managers to push teams beyond reasonable limits, even when it’s clear that timelines are overly optimistic. The focus appears to be heavily skewed toward financial outcomes, with minimal regard for employee wellbeing or sustainable delivery. Culture is another weak point. There is little interest in improving ways of working, processes, or team culture. Feedback from managers about their teams is often overlooked, and there is no meaningful emphasis on continuous improvement. Overall, aside from salary, there are no notable perks or benefits. The organization lacks balance, support, and a healthy working environment.

There is honestly nothing positive to highlight about this company in terms of processes, management, or overall experience. The only redeeming aspect is that the staff are quite approachable and easy to talk to. Beyond that, there’s significant room for improvement across the board.

Timelines are consistently unrealistic, creating sustained pressure across teams. On a daily basis, team members express high levels of stress, yet there is little to no consideration or adjustment from leadership. There is a clear disconnect between expectations and practical delivery capacity. Leadership is a major concern. The current CTO demonstrates a lack of awareness across several critical areas and tends to rely heavily on micromanagement rather than strategic direction. Decision-making often follows a rigid “my way or the highway” approach, with little regard for input from managers or the realities faced by teams. There is also significant pressure passed down to managers to push teams beyond reasonable limits, even when it’s clear that timelines are overly optimistic. The focus appears to be heavily skewed toward financial outcomes, with minimal regard for employee wellbeing or sustainable delivery. Culture is another weak point. There is little interest in improving ways of working, processes, or team culture. Feedback from managers about their teams is often overlooked, and there is no meaningful emphasis on continuous improvement. Overall, aside from salary, there are no notable perks or benefits. The organization lacks balance, support, and a healthy working environment.

Pro is the downstairs bathroom.

Management needs training, no people skills or time management skills. No accountability in management after repeated mistakes People blaming when the solution is rooted in unrealistic deadlines. Stingy with the workplace incentives e.g overtime food allowance.

- The company boasts an impressive portfolio and has experienced notable financial growth, which can be inspiring. - Competitive salary. - Interesting and challenging place to work. - Working on the forefront of an emerging technology is amazing and invigorating. - You will be the person both asking and answering Questions on Stack overflow around this technology and the most efficient and effective way to test and automate it.

- Years of technical debt and no incentive to fix it. - A culture of band-aid fixes. - Often long hours - Unexpected and short notice traveling. Working at Droneshield often feels akin to swimming against a relentless tide of technical debt. The weight of outdated practices combined with lackluster project management greatly hinders innovation. Despite the long hours we spend tied to our desks, grappling with unfinished tasks we're constantly playing catch-up. The journey from a small startup to its current state has unfortunately been marred by a steadfast adherence to antiquated methodologies. This adherence has cultivated a corporate culture that stifles any attempt at progress. As a result, leaving many employees feeling disillusioned and demoralized. Navigating projects is like sailing through a storm without a compass—every day brings a new barrage of sudden priority shifts, leaving teams adrift and struggling to maintain direction. Attempts to address these issues often meet with resistance from management, further adding to the frustration and futility felt by the staff. The project management at Droneshield is akin to navigating a ship through a storm without a compass. With each passing day, the team is subjected to a barrage of sudden and ill-managed priority and scope changes, rendering any semblance of stability or progress a distant dream. And if you have the audacity to point this out or suggest any changes to this unsustainable process, you will face disciplinary action. Many project leaders would proudly go on and on about company share price and net worth, but would refuse to provide the resources required to accomplish the goal.

A lot of technology involved.

Bad management. I'm located in Europe, they were unaware of time differencebfor example. Company didn't provide me with a company credit card, so I paid for all company trips from my pocket.

- I enjoy the deep focus on the engineering challenges spanning software, electrical, and mechanical domains. With a focus on a key range of counterdrone capabilities, it's a great opportunity for meaningful growth for building high quality and effective engineering products. - I'm happy that the engineering teams support each other, minimising silos as much as possible, and that I never feel uncomfortable contacting others in multidisciplinary teams. Also super humble and down to earth teammates. - Genuine opportunities to grow ownership and drive technical impact and direction, building with others to deliver without cutting corners.

As we are scaling up, our structure is maturing, so engineers should expect to have greater exposure to product management, requirements gathering, quality assurance, as a part of their role. It is important to be a strong communicator with many stakeholders, versus in a bigger company where you might have many layers around you.

There is honestly nothing positive to highlight about this company in terms of processes, management, or overall experience. The only redeeming aspect is that the staff are quite approachable and easy to talk to. Beyond that, there’s significant room for improvement across the board.

Timelines are consistently unrealistic, creating sustained pressure across teams. On a daily basis, team members express high levels of stress, yet there is little to no consideration or adjustment from leadership. There is a clear disconnect between expectations and practical delivery capacity. Leadership is a major concern. The current CTO demonstrates a lack of awareness across several critical areas and tends to rely heavily on micromanagement rather than strategic direction. Decision-making often follows a rigid “my way or the highway” approach, with little regard for input from managers or the realities faced by teams. There is also significant pressure passed down to managers to push teams beyond reasonable limits, even when it’s clear that timelines are overly optimistic. The focus appears to be heavily skewed toward financial outcomes, with minimal regard for employee wellbeing or sustainable delivery. Culture is another weak point. There is little interest in improving ways of working, processes, or team culture. Feedback from managers about their teams is often overlooked, and there is no meaningful emphasis on continuous improvement. Overall, aside from salary, there are no notable perks or benefits. The organization lacks balance, support, and a healthy working environment.

Rare mix of technology stacks, with abundance of opportunities to learn and develop your technical career in SW development, HW development, Systems Engineering, Project Management, Production Engineering, Quality Assurance and many more. Our technology is protecting people, borders, sensitive infrastructure and assets.

The technical problems are sometimes very difficult to solve, which requires dedication and perseverance. It's a fast paced startup.

Really cool work, plenty of opportunities to step up. Great pay.

No HR, leadership thinks they know everything and you cannot challenge their ideas, managers are tyrants

Pro is the downstairs bathroom.

Management needs training, no people skills or time management skills. No accountability in management after repeated mistakes People blaming when the solution is rooted in unrealistic deadlines. Stingy with the workplace incentives e.g overtime food allowance.