employer cover photo

Research!America

Is this your company?

Hostile environment with a wonderful mission - Anonymous employee Research!America Employee Review

1.0
23 Jan 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The mission of the organization is admirable-- you can feel good about the advocacy work being done and feel like you're part of an effective advocacy community. The day-to-day work was interesting, provided some room for learning new skills and was a valuable experience. Junior staff rallied together to help boost morale for one another in spite of the work environment.

Cons

The communications department was extremely hostile. The organization overall did not have a healthy or positive culture-- morale was always low. Staff felt overworked and drained, and did not feel their time or effort was valued. There was little collaboration among departments at the leadership level- mostly conflict, belittling and ineffectual leadership. There was constant conflict among department heads, making collaboration almost impossible (though very necessary with such a small staff). There was no opportunity for advancement (or clear path to it) or acknowledgement of a job well done. It was clear staff were expendable and could be easily replaced. Leadership does not seem to care about the high turnover, but I hope at some point they realize the current environment is not sustainable.

Explore other reviews about Research!America

5.0
9 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Happy, accommodating, impactful workplace with many great people.

Cons

Management is very individual, so your mileage may vary across the different teams. In this administration, advocacy is hard and risky.

1.0
26 Feb 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Interesting to learn about diseases and research around their cures.

Cons

Serious concerns about this organization's integrity and direction. Funding is heavily pharmaceutical-industry-dependent, raising obvious questions about whose interests are actually being served when lobbying for public research dollars. Executive compensation appears disproportionate relative to other nonprofits and what staff actually has to work with — outdated equipment being a notable example of misplaced priorities. Operationally, the culture seems to run on pressure rather than purpose, producing surveys and materials that feel more like busy work than meaningful contributions to the field. The awards program and its accompanying gala come across as self-congratulatory rather than genuinely recognition-driven. The bigger concern is sustainability. The organization appears to be built around a single long-tenured leader, and there's little evidence of a vision or structure that will outlast their overdue departure.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All