Meh - Accountant Platform Accounting Group Employee Review

I’ve worked at Platform for the past two years and have really enjoyed the experience. The company’s rapid growth has created countless opportunities to add value—whether through process improvements, onboarding and training new team members, or helping standardize how we get work done across different offices. One of the most exciting things has been watching Platform evolve. When I joined, the company was already very good at acquiring firms. Over time, I’ve seen us become even better at integrating those firms and setting them up for long-term success. It’s been rewarding to be part of that transformation. I’m especially grateful for the chance to grow alongside the company. I’ve learned a lot, stretched my skills, and been trusted to contribute in meaningful ways. It’s energizing to be part of a team that’s building something great—and doing it the right way.

With growth comes change, and the pace of change isn’t the right fit for everyone. I’ve seen some experienced and hardworking individuals decide to move on—often heading into retirement—because adapting to new systems and processes later in their career wasn’t something they wanted to take on. While the company offers opportunities to learn and grow, it can be a challenging environment for those not looking to embrace continual change.

• Many colleagues were dedicated, collaborative, and genuinely committed to delivering quality work. • The role offered exposure to complex, high‑level projects that strengthened technical and leadership skills. There was not a set growth plan so it was due to necessity as team members left. • Client relationships were often the most meaningful and rewarding part of the job.

• The firm increasingly prioritized revenue and short‑term gains over quality, learning, and long‑term team development. This shift made it difficult to maintain high standards or invest in the people doing the work. • Team members who advocated for improvements, quality, or sustainable practices were not supported or invested in, which made it challenging to build a stable, engaged team. • Employees were not treated consistently, and expectations varied widely, creating uneven workloads and unclear standards. • Limited investment in training, process improvement, or structured systems meant teams often had to compensate for gaps while still meeting aggressive expectations.