Not recommended ! - Anonymous employee Onsurity Employee Review

1.0
14 Jul 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Appreciation for small works, Motivation to work ( from one of the fonder) Financial security

Cons

They don't know what they are building! Every day new ideas! You can expect a call at any time from early morning to midnight for quick works, which will end up in a sleepless night. Very toxic atmosphere to work lost of drama in a Startup! No work-life balance. No care for people! (will push you to come to the office in the middle of a pandemic) Every day is a war zone. from 8:30 Am to 12:30 Am. Forget about self-growth! One of the founders is short-tempered. So we have to live in fear of that! The product manager will explain problems in such a way that no one will understand! 8hrs is the deadline for all works! If we ask for deadline expectation all they will tell is yesterday! There is only work no life!

Explore other reviews about Onsurity

5.0
14 Jul 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great work culture plus and good vibe

Cons

Typical startup cons but work is interesting

1.0
16 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good salary structure and salaries are generally paid on time. Earlier, the company had a flexible and supportive culture with good learning opportunities and talented people across teams. The initial engineering leadership and managers created a positive work environment, and employees had decent ownership and freedom in execution.

Cons

Over time, the organization started feeling more execution-driven and reactive rather than process-driven and stable. There has been continuous attrition across engineering leadership, with multiple managers, directors, CTOs, and experienced employees leaving within short periods. Priorities and projects change very frequently depending on the latest direction from upper management, and some projects are started with high urgency only to be dropped midway later. The AI initiatives also felt more “AI-powered” in presentation rather than involving deep technical AI/ML engineering work, with strong focus on prompting/tools instead of building long-term core systems or research-oriented solutions. There was also increased micromanagement from senior leadership, reduced flexibility/WFH culture, and growing expectations around weekend availability. Hiring and team planning at times appeared very short-term focused, where people were brought in for immediate deliverables without enough emphasis on long-term retention or team stability. Upper management also became heavily involved in day-to-day technical execution and access control instead of focusing more on strategic growth and business direction.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All