political workplace - Biomedical Technician McKesson Employee Review

2.0
1 Apr 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Clean workplace - Good Paid Time Off - Diversity

Cons

- Micromanaging every single thing - Production/ assembly work environment and it does not seems like a BioMed job. They care about how many devices you do a day. - Management lies to get the new hires accept the job. - Management is still struggling with the high employee turnover rate - Too Political work environment - If you are not part of a group, you will not get what you want from the management - Gossiping is toxic here - LOAD work Environment and workers play music loudly out of their computers and smartphones. It is a complete disaster. - Management overlooks people's knowledge of the Biomed industry and tries to control your skills and treat you like if you were a robot - They find ways to pay you less compared to the productivity you provide for the company. They exhaust you while the pay is less than the other employers. You have high productivity while trying to pay you less. - Senior management does not try to get involved in making this place a better place for the current and new employees - Pay is down compared to what you provide for the company

Explore other reviews about McKesson

5.0
28 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great benefits, culture, and work-life balance

Cons

No cons to report on the company.

avatar
McKesson Response
1mo
Thank you for your review! We’re so glad your experience at McKesson has been a great one. Together, we are shaping the future of health for our patients, our communities, our people, and you.
1.0
3 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. relatively aloof culture for ICs to grow on their own 2. on and off few people are good 3. Actually consultants in india are better than some full time hires to work with. The h1bs in full time roles and some GCs/Americans are just 1 step away from unemployment line but there are some good quality consultants who can be directed well to bring in good work. Problem is lack of direction when middle management is just running after money.

Cons

1. top most management is clueless to what is going post the middle tier 2. middle tiers - VPs/SVPs/Directors and Sr. Directors are among the worst. Mostly cast offs from Consulting firms/Tech cos/Other Healthcare firms, this group has some of the worst, clueless folks who just think very narrowly about how to get rid of problems, maybe craft a story for higher ups. Get rid of this layer ( so called people management ) and co. could shine better on the work of ICs, decent software engineers and regular rank and file. 3. Main money maker distribution is different from tech group and the IT here is almost comical - 2 years ago in 2024 there were "directors" bringing AI agents with 90% hallucination .. I mean that has got to be an industry first!

1
avatar
McKesson Response
1mo
Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. We are committed to creating a positive work environment and are disappointed to learn that we fell short. We are taking your feedback seriously and are making efforts to address the concerns raised. Please feel free to reach out for a more in-depth discussion.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All