Improving! - Senior Principal Engineer Leidos Employee Review

4.0
23 Nov 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Talented technical staff; customer contracting opportunities improving; Lockheed IS&GS acquisition improving bottom line; company reorganization maintaining entrepreneurial applied science culture

Cons

Remnants of Balkanized "Old SAIC" culture remain, making inter-organizational collaboration difficult at times; positions very dependent on immediate coverage, no overhead opportunities to bridge between contracts; mobility between organizations difficult for senior staff

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
20 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

great work life balance nice

Cons

none, i like it here

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All