Great people and a wide variety of cool products and work. It isn't like the rest of the commercial world.
Cons
Tend to work alone a lot. Don't tend to get a lot of guidance and support unless you beg for it. More desk work than I like but this is in the goal for reliability which tends to drive a lot of analysis, aka: desk work.
L3Harris Response
5y
We're happy to hear you're enjoying your experience with your team, and we agree that our employees are the reason we're so innovative. We also want to be sure you're feeling heard and appreciated. We encourage you to participate in the action planning process from the results of our employee engagement survey to discuss ways managers can engage and foster the development of their direct reports or you can reach out to your HR Business Partner to work with them to ensure you are getting the support you need.
Explore other reviews about L3Harris
5.0
6 Apr 2026
Anonymous intern
Former intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook
Pros
The manager was very nice, but also made sure I was learning.
Missions are impactful to the world
Top talent in specialized fields
Wonderful people
Respectful environment
Cons
Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways
Shared service model is not structured properly
Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries
Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects
Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs)
All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times