Steady but unglamorous job - Financial Analyst L3Harris Employee Review

3.0
18 Aug 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Stable -Great work schedule (9/80) -Working for a good cause

Cons

-Employees are sometimes expected to work long hours and deal with ancient processes -Company culture is not super friendly - management tends to promote those who are super aggressive -"Good ol' boys" type environment - employees are mainly middle aged to older men with not a lot of diversity -Change takes forever

avatar
L3Harris Response
5y
Thanks for your review. We're working hard to further develop an engaging and inclusive culture through programs such as our eight employee resource groups. We're also proud of the external recognitions we have received, including a score of 100% on the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index and our inclusion in the 2020 Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index. We wish you the best!

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
6 Apr 2026
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The manager was very nice, but also made sure I was learning.

Cons

The workplace was old and outdated.

2.0
5 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All