Good work life balance, not much room for growth - Staff Attorney Giffords Employee Review

4.0
13 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

GIFFORDS has a strong culture that prioritizes family life and mental well-being. There is always interesting work to be done and everyone in the org is friendly and passionate about the work.

Cons

There is not much opportunity for career development or for upwards mobility so people either tend to stick around for a long time in the same position because of how flexible and family friendly the culture is, or leave for career advancement after 1-3 years.

Explore other reviews about Giffords

5.0
3 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Great culture, friendly people - Amazing work-life balance, especially for DC advocacy org - Feels like we really hit our stride in last few years - Lots of PTO, off between xmas & new years

Cons

- Difficult issue to work on day-in and day-out - Try to do a lot for a modestly sized organization

1.0
29 Jul 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The mission is powerful and the staff are some of the most passionate and dedicated people you’ll find.

Cons

Since Emma Brown took over as CEO in January 2024, the culture at Giffords has steadily declined. What was once a workplace rooted in trust and flexibility now feels rigid, top-down, and disconnected from staff. Early on, she implemented a mandatory camera-on policy during meetings. It was framed as a way to improve engagement, but the message was clear. Leadership doesn’t trust people to work unless they can be seen. Then came the announcement that DC staff would be required to return to the office twice a week starting in October. This was decided without consultation or explanation, and only applies to the DC team. The San Francisco office remains mostly remote. Remote staff are unaffected. The difference? San Francisco is staffed largely by high-paid lawyers, and leadership likely knows better than to push them in the same way. It feels targeted and inequitable. What used to feel like a progressive, values-driven organization now feels like it is being run from a campaign war room. Staff feedback is ignored, and morale has taken a clear hit. The name is Giffords, not Brown. But that distinction seems to be lost on the current leadership.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All