employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Farnsworth Group Inc

Engaged employer

Disappointed and Disenfranchised - Anonymous employee Farnsworth Group Inc Employee Review

1.0
17 Nov 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are a lot of good people at the grassroots level of this organization. The work can be challenging and fulfilling, the projects can be quite interesting. And the way the company is structured, with local offices (centers), fosters a strong sense of local community.

Cons

This is where there are numerous issues. 1. The company itself is top-heavy. Too many people with the title project manager, not enough people who actually know how to manage projects, from start to finish. It almost seems like people get hung up on title. 2. Too many decisions are made by committee, which means it takes a very long time to get any initiatives to move forward. In fact, most of the excellent ideas that people have never get considered because of the way decisions are made. 3. There is not a master strategy for working with the different operational groups amongst disciplines. This creates a negative competition between disciplines and groups, where they work against each other, rather than with each other. 4. While there are a lot of great people, there is a lot of politics at the company as well, especially at the management level. If you aren't part of the club, then you're perpetually on the outs, with little to no support. Many people find themselves not being communicated with when it comes to decisions that should involve their input. 5. The compensation across the board is below average for the different roles in the company. Additionally, though they give bonuses, there is a mystery as to how those are decided upon. Despite strong performance reviews, the effort didn't seem fairly rewarded. 6. The CEO seems out of touch with all of the "grass-roots" people at the company, never really making much of an effort to communicate with anyone other than who she feels she needs to interact with. 7. In a booming economy, the company is struggling to get work. After speaking with many potential clients with whom Farnsworth interviewed, the common theme for not choosing Farnsworth Group is that Farnsworth is a mid-size company that charges higher prices, (likely due to labor rates that are too high). Yet the breadth and depth of services they offer is small to mid-size level offerings that don't justify the premium price they place, often falling short of what they could truly offer. 8. HR seems to run the company, rather than the CEO. It seems like most of the decisions that get made happen from the head of HR. Unfortunately, HR looks after the company's interests, not the peoples.

Explore other reviews about Farnsworth Group Inc

5.0
7 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great work environment and exposure to different areas of experience.

Cons

Not sure yet. Have not been around long enough.

2.0
20 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Colleagues - Lots of work, so lots of experience - Admin staff - Basic benefits like anywhere else - Monthly phone stipend - Company vehicle for traveling to job sites

Cons

- Remote work became less and less tolerated (even if work was being completed) - Pay was stagnant and only received inflation-related raises. To put some context, our hourly fees increased about 10-15% each year for inflation and miscellaneous factors, and our pay only increased 9% total in three years. - Always encouraged to work extra hours to meet deadlines, however, no overtime pay. - Year end bonuses were abysmal for the first two years even after record breaking revenues those years. At a point, there was no incentive to work harder if the year end bonus was only going to be f i v e h u n d r e d dollars compared to the thousands upper management was receiving on top of profit sharing. - Profit sharing: only a select few within company are invited - Management: Some managers took the job way too seriously, micromanaging and feeling them breathe on your neck. It clearly showed how little they knew about managing individuals and only cared about profits and how many hours were used on a project. - Saw more HR hires rather than engineer hires to help balance work loads - Constant pressure on our time sheets and making us move time away from general and into projects…

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All