Low Pay. Good Culture. It's What You Make It. - Registered Nurse Duke Health Employee Review

4.0
21 Feb 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Clinical leadership and knowing all your options in the nursing field. You also do get to work with some of the sickest patients in the country if you like that stuff. The most medically complex cases in the south for sure. You will love your job and coworkers more than life. PTO. You do get a great deal, and you can use it well. -Experience. It is a fun place to be!

Cons

Cons: -You will not be paid well as a nurse here. Tuition reimbursement is taxed. Duke RN TAP is taxed. If you want to go to Duke for your MSN or DNP, it will be about 45% off of a Duke tuition with the tax bill. So, about $45k out of pocket. If you are an employee for 2 years, you can do the $5250 per year and use that at any in state college. That is not taxed. You can use both for your MSN/DNP if you did not do the loan forgiveness for nurses. So if you want to go to Duke for your MSN/DNP, it will cost about $35k if you do not use the loan forgiveness. You will start at the same rate no matter if you are a BSN or an ADN. -Cafeteria does not over diverse options for patients. Limited Kosher and Halal for our patients families. -You have to pay about $92 a month for parking -Retirement options are bleak for hourly employees. No match. Salaried employees may be better off.

Explore other reviews about Duke Health

5.0
2 Jul 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great place to work! Excellent benefits, competitive pay, opportunities for growth.

Cons

Parking is expensive and sometimes far from campus.

1.0
23 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The work is meaningful and the team consists of some highly skilled professionals who are dedicated to supporting patients, providers, and the organization. The role provides exposure to complex issues and opportunities for professional growth.

Cons

The department suffers from significant leadership and culture challenges. Employees are hired as experienced professionals but are given little autonomy to perform the work they were hired to do. Leadership frequently inserts itself into routine matters, creating unnecessary delays and fostering a culture of micromanagement rather than trust. Communication is inconsistent and often lacks accountability. Important decisions and changes are frequently communicated verbally without written follow-up, creating confusion and shifting expectations. Employees are expected to remember evolving guidance, identify leadership mistakes, and compensate for communication failures. There is a noticeable gap between leadership messaging and employee experience. Work-life balance, employee engagement, and professional respect are regularly discussed, but many employees do not experience those values in practice. Concerns raised by employees do not appear to result in meaningful change, contributing to low morale and diminished trust in leadership. Leadership often responds to issues by implementing department-wide restrictions rather than addressing the specific individuals or situations involved. As a result, high-performing employees are subjected to increasing oversight and reduced autonomy because leadership is unwilling to address performance concerns directly. Turnover, employee dissatisfaction, and leadership credibility have been ongoing concerns. The department would benefit from leaders who are willing to listen, communicate transparently, accept accountability, and trust the expertise of the professionals they supervise.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All