employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Caesars Entertainment

Is this your company?

Profits before people just like everywhere else - Anonymous employee Caesars Entertainment Employee Review

2.0
20 May 2010
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I was an office worker and I enjoyed the environment. PTO was good and I had no problem taking full advantage of that. There was "health care" but the lower wage worker had to go to the on sight clinic and get scripts from their pharmacy, otherwise the participting Docs were too expensive and LOW quality. There was an excellent fitness center on site and free "food".

Cons

Uppermanagement made me sick with all of the skewed facts to make themselves look good. The 401k match was taken away but never put back. The pay was dismal. I did a similar but less demanding job in another market an made 30% more but that's just the a.c. Job culture of keep em poor. After 2 years and one outstanding review after another I still did not make enough to live on my own. Ok, I made 11.47 an hour ugh. I hate to say it. Thank god I was able to move on from that hole of a city.

Explore other reviews about Caesars Entertainment

5.0
23 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great company and opportunities to move up!

Cons

It is a lot of work but very worth it!

2.0
29 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Peers and teammates are supportive of each other. For a digital organization, the pay was very good but I believe they've significantly reduced salaries. Some of the managers were very good.

Cons

The Caesars Digital team operated in a flat organization, where some GMs were trying to actively manage teams of 75-150 individuals. Career growth is almost non-existent as a result. C-suite management was non-existent and came from finance or hospitality backgrounds. Org success was purely tied to annual EBITDA and without understanding of how a digital/engineering organization should be run, resulting in disconnected employees (most of whom were remote), lack of scalable structure, and zero oversight.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All