Cover image for Washington River Protection Solutions
Logo

Washington River Protection Solutions

Is this your company?

Washington River Protection Solutions

Add a Review

Washington River Protection Solutions Employee Reviews about "pay and benefits"

Updated 5 Jun 2020

Verify your email to use filters. Having problems? Resend email
Found 100 of over 100 reviews
3.6
75% Recommend to a Friend
82% Approve of CEO

Found 7 of over 100 reviews

3.6
75%
Recommend to a Friend
82%
Approve of CEO
Washington River Protection Solutions President & Project Manager L. David Olson (no image)
L. David Olson
38 Ratings
Pros
  • "Good pay great benefits great coworjers(in 10 reviews)

  • "Good work/life balance, four 10 hour day weeks, good pay(in 5 reviews)

  • Cons
  • "Long commute and dealing with multiple contractors and unions(in 6 reviews)

  • "Lots of red tape, work can move slowly at times(in 3 reviews)

  • More Pros and Cons
    Pros & Cons are excerpts from user reviews. They are not authored by Glassdoor.

    Choose a different language and keep reading other reviews.

    Reviews about "pay and benefits"

    Return to all Reviews
    1. 1.0
      Former Contractor, more than 3 years

      Union is very very corrupt

      5 Jun 2020 - Safety Specialist in Montgomery, AL
      Recommend
      CEO Approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      flexible schedule, good pay and benefits

      Cons

      politics, danger, corrupt union, management

      Continue reading
      Be the first to find this review helpful
    2. 3.0
      Former Employee, less than 1 year

      Not enough work..

      23 Aug 2019 - Contract Administrator in Richland, WA
      Recommend
      CEO Approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Good pay/benefits, rotational job shadow program for new hires

      Cons

      Not enough work to fill a work day/week!

      Continue reading
      Be the first to find this review helpful
    3. Join the Washington River Protection Solutions team
      See Our Latest Jobs
    4. 3.0
      Current Employee, more than 3 years

      Upper Management needs to pay attention.

      17 Sep 2018 - Anonymous Employee in Richland, WA
      Recommend
      CEO Approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Good pay, benefits, hours, low stress level

      Cons

      (Level 2) Middle Management encourage employees to leave. Talk a great game but never follow through, only do what is in their best interest.

      Continue reading
      1 person found this review helpful
    5. 3.0
      Current Employee, more than 8 years

      Engaged work with a touch of the paperwork blues.

      15 Dec 2017 - I&C Engineer in Richland, WA
      Recommend
      CEO Approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Highly intellectual work with nice people. Great pay and benefits with a good work life balance. Good job for engineers looking to learn the business.

      Cons

      The projects tend to drag on for long periods of time due to lack of experienced resources and the requirement to document everything.

      Continue reading
      1 person found this review helpful
    6. 4.0
      Current Employee

      Interesting work, in a fantasy world

      27 Jul 2016 - Chemical Engineer in Richland, WA
      Recommend
      CEO Approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Good pay and benefits; interesting work

      Cons

      Working as a contractor for the US Dept. of Energy means you never know when your project will be canceled for no reason, or delayed by the farcical political issue of the day.

      Continue reading
      2 people found this review helpful
    7. 2.0
      Current Employee

      Difficult Place to Work

      9 May 2016 - Anonymous Employee 
      Recommend
      CEO Approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      The pay and benefits are about it.

      Cons

      Everything is broken, meaning the processes and procedures for just about everything. The craft don't care about getting work done and are seriously disgruntled. The Non-craft for the most part really don't care either and the majority of the workforce is in the 50's/60's. If you're a motivated person who wants to get work done you will be frustrated at the end of every day. That's why most people leave as soon as possible. Everything gets buried in needless paperwork or takes twice as long to do because that's how its done and has been done. Nothing makes sense.

      Continue reading
      2 people found this review helpful
    8. 2.0
      Current Employee

      Work Is Interesting, Company Only So-So

      9 Sep 2015 - Anonymous Employee 
      Recommend
      CEO Approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      - The work itself is actually very interesting and can offer some good growth opportunities to expand professional skills and knowledge. - The pay especially for folks fresh from school with only a bachelors degree and no or minimal work experience is usually higher than average for most fields vs. what the private and other State and Federal government agencies pay. - Benefits, vacation hours, and paid holidays are decent and within normal range. - Majority of the general employees are knowledgeable, well educated, and very interesting to work with. - Once in the DOE-EM complex system, its usually not difficult to create the network resources and access needed to jump around the different DOE sites and contractors.

      Cons

      - There is absolutely zero career training or professional development offered and minimal tuition reimbursement available (mostly reserved for masters, little support for bachelors or doctorate). - Typically work will be assigned with zero mentoring or training so for people that aren't good or don't enjoy the challenge this approach presents can often find working here to be exceedingly stressful. Oh, and like all government jobs, you will be assigned to do the work of multiple full-time employees since most groups are under-staffed, sometimes horrifically so due to the high turnover rate. - Can serve as a good stepping for early and mid-career professionals, but other than experience you gain on-the-job, no advancement to career or professional knowledge will be made so its best not to work here more than 5 years, most people prefer not to exceed 3 and a lot of people, especially those new to this type of work, have a hard time even making it through their first year. - Job is serving as a contractor to US DOE EM Division; so to 'escape' the DOE world after entering if you want to jump back to the private sector or non-government work can sometimes be difficult as its not uncommon for ex-employees from here to find they've been black-balled from being hired due to the reputation the company and this particular DOE site has outside the DOE-EM Complex. - It is both contractor work and government work, which means congressional funding shenanigans do adversely impact workers and lay-offs are common. Its also an exceedingly stressful and difficult place to work just before, during, and immediately after a change in the prime contracts and contractors. - There is minimal promotional opportunity to lead or supervisor positions, and for the most part, zero promotion potential to a management position. Most lead positions, especially management, are nearly universally filled by corporate folks. The company also no longer supports in-grade promotions (so other than rare and minimal salary bumps which in the past 10 years, have not even kept up with cost of living or the increases in our insurance premiums, so do not expect your salary or grade to ever truly increase after hiring unless you jump to another job or company). - Since management is comprised of corporate employees brought in from outside the area that are present only for a short span of time (2 years max typically) they have no personal or professional investment, or interest in investing in or supporting, their inherited, local employees (i.e. anyone who is not corporate). So their attitudes and behaviors are generally poor and often this results in them neglecting and abusing most of the general employees, so retaliation and a hostile work environment and management team is not un-common.

      Continue reading
      3 people found this review helpful
    Viewing 1 - 7 of 7 English Reviews
    </>Embed

    Popular Careers with Washington River Protection Solutions Job Seekers

    JobsSalariesInterviews

    Work at Washington River Protection Solutions? Share Your Experiences

    Washington River Protection Solutions logo
    or

    Reviews by Job Title

    Washington River Protection Solutions Photos

    + Add Photo
    Washington River Protection Solutions photo of: Hanford Site, 200 E., A-AX Tank Farms

    Have you worked here?

    See All Photos

    Washington River Protection Solutions Job Seekers Also Viewed

    AECOM Logo
    AECOM

    3.5

    8,810 reviews
    Compare

    Glassdoor has 100 Washington River Protection Solutions reviews submitted anonymously by Washington River Protection Solutions employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Washington River Protection Solutions is right for you.