New Branch/Terrible Experience!! - Executive Recruiter Randstad Employee Review

1.0
28 Oct 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I had the ability to start up a new branch of Randstad Professionals in Nashville. We were the ONLY division of Randstad in the entire market area! (Or so I thought!)

Cons

When I started in June 2014, my hiring manager (Mark Bernecker) told me we were the only Randstad branch in the entire city. Three months into it, however, I discovered that there were multiple branches of Randstad's General Staffing division all over this market. What's worse is that we were stepping all over each other! Our separate divisions worked as entirely separate companies, each one not knowing what the other was doing. We did not share databases, so we were constantly calling on the same candidates and the same companies. It was confusing to us, confusing to our candidates, and confusing to our clients. After making this discovery, I reported it to my management team (Mark Bernecker and Macon Albertson). They got together with the management team of Randstad General Staffing and in Jan 2015 we were all sent to a hotel for the day (the Randstad Professionals division and Randstad General Staffing division) to have a meeting to separate our divisions. By the end of the meeting it was clear that the Randstad Professionals division (my division) was given an unfavorable set of rules to operate by. In a nutshell, because Randstad General Staffing had been in the market for over 30 years, they were given the ability to work on all transactional Finance and Accounting jobs, while Randstad Professionals division was only able to work on Staff Accountant level positions on up to CFO level positions. This is fine if we were Direct Placement professionals (PERM) only, but they also wanted us to build a Temp team. Anyone who has had any experience in temp staffing knows that the VOLUME of temp positions within Finance and Accounting are going to be at the transactional level. In addition, the Nashville branch was the ONLY Professionals branch in the entire country operating this way. I knew right away that the management team had set us up to fail with this new set of rules. As an employee of one of the largest Staffing and Recruiting companies, I felt very disrespected as a professional with talent and experience. The entire Randstad organization is very unorganized since their merger with The Mergis Group. If you are considering working for the Randstad Professionals branch in Nashville, consider this a warning. Be sure to negotiate a year-long "guarantee" period if you are wanting to do Direct Placement. You will need a LOT of ramp up time in order to start a branch from scratch in this market, and to overcome a lot of burnt bridges that took place with candidates and clients due to the company's disorganization and oversight.

Explore other reviews about Randstad

5.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Loved my team. My Manager was incredibly supportive, understand, and always rooting for myself as well as my teammate's success. Remote work was highly flexible and accommodating.

Cons

Pay was a little low and you don't get paid for holidays in your probationary period but there's growth opportunities after 6 months of employment.

1.0
27 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Recruiter was responsive at first, and the team I spoke with at the client company seemed professional and genuinely kind.

Cons

Here’s a more detailed “Cons” you can use and tweak: Cons: I went all the way through onboarding for a contract role, spent a full day last week chasing down and uploading sensitive documents (including my passport), and was told I’d be starting this week. Then, at the last minute, I got a single text saying I “didn’t pass” a third‑party ID check — with no explanation of what supposedly failed and no formal notice or report to review. As an American citizen using a valid passport, it’s really disturbing to have a job pulled over an opaque automated screening and to be told “other factors” were flagged without anyone willing or able to say what they were. Even after repeatedly asking, I was given no more than a generic privacy policy and bounced between contacts, which feels extremely careless with my time, my livelihood, and the very private identity data they collected. Best‑practice guidance for background checks says candidates should get clear written notice and a chance to understand or dispute issues before a job is taken away; that absolutely did not happen here.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All