G-Research Quantitative Research interview questions

Not allowed to share any details. Interview was online as a test with questions that I needed to answer. I can not comment on the questions asked as this is prohibited.

Great experience, interviewers were nice and positive, they are not trying to make you uncomfortable, one of them was asked a very vague question, open ended that I couldn’t understand

1. Introduction and casual conversation The meeting will start with the interviewers identifying and introducing themselves to you, usually with a handshake. You should react confidently and maintain good eye contact. This stage is about breaking the ice and establishing good rapport. It's likely that the hiring manager is assessing your interpersonal skills. Your interviewer will usually keep the conversation light and positive, perhaps including information on the job or a tour of the workplace.

Fine process that could be long with several interviews. Easy contact with HR After the online assesment. Then the triage interview and the two n'est interviews were fine. Thanks G Research

Sent an online application by completing a form that was sent to me via email. I had to answer a few multiple-option questions. The whole process did not last more than a couple of hours

LeetCode Medium Problem (Greedy Algorithm): Solve a medium-level LeetCode problem using a greedy algorithm approach. Write efficient code, analyze complexity, and discuss optimizations. Statistics Problem: Analyze a provided statistical scenario or dataset, apply relevant statistical methods, interpret results, and engage in a discussion about your approach and findings.

1. Online quizz on math 2. Online interview on math/brainteasers/machine learning Summary of the experience: Negative experience, many interviews, lot of emails with the recruiters and the interviewer lacked empathy. I have a PhD in Electrical Engineering, but the questions focused more on elementary computations. With my background, I was anticipating a deep dive into complex, technical topics. The overall environment during the interview felt less than congenial.The lack of empathy from the interviewer, to be frank, left me feeling uncomfortable rather than challenged.

Multiple interviews with a mix of brainteasers and open ended questions. Interviewers were friendly and helpful. Questions were interesting and fun. Generally a positive experience. Interview process was efficient, although long.

Interview asked moderate level questions on stats and maths brain teasers. I thought I did pretty well but clearly not as the feedback was in a sarcastic tone about how the interviewer couldn’t believe how badly I apparently messed up a question. Not a great feedback process

Initially a smooth process. At the second round they said it would have been just a talk about future rounds, but it was instead a technical interview. This is why I don't give thumbs up to the process.